Opendata, web and dolomites

Censoring Chaucer TERMINATED

Censoring Chaucer: Canonicity and Obscenity in Manuscripts and Print Editions of the Canterbury Tales (c. 1400 - 1831)

Total Cost €

0

EC-Contrib. €

0

Partnership

0

Views

0

 Censoring Chaucer project word cloud

Explore the words cloud of the Censoring Chaucer project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "Censoring Chaucer" about.

engagement    situate    readers    downplay    chaucer    me    content    modernizers    poet    annotations    1405    books    printed    expert    odds    famous    editors    expurgated    regarding    death    relation    reputation    viewed    msca    laureate    modify    canterbury    writers    day    contemporaneous    eyes    publication    status    print    training    variations    public    robert    perceive    obscenity    oxford    widest    effort    intensive    comment    investigates    period    reader    surviving    incorporates    modern    heritage    tales    sex    functions    1831    manuscript    perceived    made    persistently    earliest    intended    conference    history    scholarly    fellowship    communicate    canonicity    body    medieval    audience    remarks    whereas    southey    language    articles    scribes    closely    note    version    obscene    1400    book    compiled    presentations    incunables    bodily    alongside    canonical    occasionally    course    editions    least    university    relationship    literary    traces    indecorous    tension    building    manuscripts   

Project "Censoring Chaucer" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.

Coordinator
THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD 

Organization address
address: WELLINGTON SQUARE UNIVERSITY OFFICES
city: OXFORD
postcode: OX1 2JD
website: www.ox.ac.uk

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country United Kingdom [UK]
 Total cost 195˙454 €
 EC max contribution 195˙454 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.3.2. (Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility)
 Code Call H2020-MSCA-IF-2016
 Funding Scheme MSCA-IF-EF-ST
 Starting year 2018
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2018-09-01   to  2020-08-31

 Partnership

Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD UK (OXFORD) coordinator 195˙454.00

Map

 Project objective

This project investigates the relationship between Chaucer's canonical status and his obscenity, both of which have been closely associated with the Canterbury Tales since Chaucer's death in 1400. Readers of the Canterbury Tales have made note of its occasionally indecorous language and content (particularly in relation to sex, the body, and bodily functions) ever since the earliest surviving manuscript was compiled c. 1405. But whereas obscenity is one of the major features of Chaucer's reputation in the eyes of present-day readers, many medieval and early modern readers viewed Chaucer’s obscene matter as standing at odds with his canonicity. This project traces the building tension between Chaucer's perceived obscenity and his literary reputation from his death in 1400 to the publication of poet laureate Robert Southey's expurgated version of the Canterbury Tales in 1831. By examining variations in the language and content of manuscripts, incunables, and print editions of the Canterbury Tales produced within this period (as well as reader annotations), I will show that scribes, readers, editors, and modernizers of Chaucer's most famous work persistently modify or comment on its language and content in an effort to downplay (or, occasionally, to enhance) what they perceive as obscene. I situate my findings alongside contemporaneous remarks by writers and editors regarding Chaucer's literary heritage in order to assess the relationship between variations in his reputation and variations in the Canterbury Tales. The project incorporates intensive training in the study of manuscripts and early printed books, and will result in at least 2 scholarly articles, a book proposal, and several conference presentations and public engagement initiatives intended to communicate my results to the widest possible audience. A MSCA Fellowship at the University of Oxford will enable me to work closely with a leading expert in the history of the book over the course of the project.

 Publications

year authors and title journal last update
List of publications.
2020 Mary C. Flannery
\'Et cetera: Obscenity and Textual Play in the Hengwrt Manuscript\'
published pages: , ISSN: 0190-2407, DOI:
Studies in the Age of Chaucer 42 2020-01-30
2019 Mary C. Flannery
\'Looking for Scribal Play in Oxford, New College MS 314\'
published pages: , ISSN: 2517-6935, DOI:
New College Notes 12 2020-01-30
2018 Mary C. Flannery
\'Response: Langlandian Personification\'
published pages: , ISSN: 0890-2917, DOI:
Yearbook of Langland Studies 33 2020-01-30

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "CENSORING CHAUCER" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "CENSORING CHAUCER" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.3.2.)

BirthControlEnvirons (2019)

Contraception meets the environment: everyday contraceptive practices, politics, and futures in a toxic age

Read More  

STIMOS (2019)

Stimulation of Multiple Organoids Simultaneously

Read More  

VINCI (2020)

The Value of Information and Choice to Improve Control.

Read More