Explore the words cloud of the ArtHistCEE project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "ArtHistCEE" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
FUNDATIA NOUA EUROPA
|Coordinator Country||Romania [RO]|
|Total cost||1˙192˙250 €|
|EC max contribution||1˙192˙250 € (100%)|
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
|Duration (year-month-day)||from 2018-10-01 to 2023-09-30|
Take a look of project's partnership.
|1||FUNDATIA NOUA EUROPA||RO (BUCURESTI)||coordinator||1˙192˙250.00|
Our project proposes a fragmentary account of the art histories produced in present-day Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Serbia between 1850 and 1950, from an entangled histories perspective. We will look at the relationships between the art histories produced in these countries and the art histories produced in Western Europe. But, more importantly, we will investigate how the art histories written in the countries mentioned above resonate with each other, either proposing conflicting interpretations of the past, or ignoring uncomfortable competing discourses. We will investigate the art histories written between 1850 and 1950 because we are interested in how art history contributed to nation building discourses. Therefore, we will focus on those art histories that concur to nationalising the past. Our project is articulated around three crucial concepts – periodisation, style and influence – set in the context of relevant contemporary historiographies produced in Western Europe, and analysing the entanglements with competing historiographies in each of the countries considered. We will focus on two main issues: 1. How did Central and Eastern European art historians adopt, adapt and respond to theoretical and methodological issues developed elsewhere, and 2. What are the periodisations of art produced on the territory of Central and Eastern European countries; what are the theoretical and methodological strategies for conceptualising local styles; and how was the concept of influence used in establishing hierarchical relationships. Researching the conceptualisation of a theoretical framework that would accommodate the artistic production of the past will show the difficulties in dealing with a complex reality without simplifying and essentializing it along ideological lines. The research will also show that the three concepts that we focus on are not neutral or strictly descriptive, and that their use in art history needs to be reconsidered.
|Data Management Plan||Open Research Data Pilot||2019-06-06 16:05:21|
Take a look to the deliverables list in detail: detailed list of ArtHistCEE deliverables.
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "ARTHISTCEE" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (email@example.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "ARTHISTCEE" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.
Elucidating the development of sexually-dimorphic circuits: from molecular mechanisms to synapses and behaviorRead More
BIOHYBRID AND BIODEGRADABLE NANOVACCINES FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPYRead More
The Enemy of the Good: Towards a Theory of Moral ProgressRead More