Opendata, web and dolomites

BoundSci

Boundaries of Science: Medieval Condemnations of Philosophy as Heresy

Total Cost €

0

EC-Contrib. €

0

Partnership

0

Views

0

 BoundSci project word cloud

Explore the words cloud of the BoundSci project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "BoundSci" about.

acted    protection    investigation    documentary    question    motivation    strategically    theories    boundary    perspective    outlook    preliminary    central    foundation    definition    aristotle    condemn    reception    books    holding    accept    risky    thinking    modern    society    source    science    negotiation    witness    heretical    discovery    surprising    philosophy    context    14th    entered    opposing    permitted    alien    church    labelled    heresy    interpreters    philosophical    fit    scarce    13th    relationship    innovative    drawn    groups    positions    curiously    contribution    medieval    world    aristotelian    historiography    classed    builds    theological    examine    scholars    controversy    perceive    revolution    condemnations    subject    writings    condemned    give    scholastics    doctrines    dangerous    believe    multidisciplinary    sparked    caused    calling    ideas    limits    origins    natural    place    muslim    relies    indicate    christian    history    university    view    fact    views    scientific    thought    redefining    faith    heritage    did    instead    centuries    prepared    critical    denied    boundaries   

Project "BoundSci" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.

Coordinator
THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD 

Organization address
address: WELLINGTON SQUARE UNIVERSITY OFFICES
city: OXFORD
postcode: OX1 2JD
website: www.ox.ac.uk

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country United Kingdom [UK]
 Project website https://www.theology.ox.ac.uk/boundsci/home
 Total cost 183˙454 €
 EC max contribution 183˙454 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.3.2. (Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility)
 Code Call H2020-MSCA-IF-2015
 Funding Scheme MSCA-IF-EF-ST
 Starting year 2016
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2016-09-15   to  2018-09-14

 Partnership

Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD UK (OXFORD) coordinator 183˙454.00

Map

 Project objective

‘Boundaries of Science: Medieval Condemnations of Philosophy as Heresy’ addresses the limits we place on scientific investigation, according to our world view and what new ideas we are prepared to accept. It focuses on a critical example during the foundation of modern science in the 13th/14th centuries, when Aristotelian natural philosophy (books by Aristotle and his Muslim interpreters) entered Europe. This alien thinking caused a scientific revolution, but sparked controversy where theories denied Christian doctrines central to society’s outlook. Church and university authorities opposing dangerous theories condemned them, and investigated scholars. This project builds on my surprising discovery that some medieval scholastics labelled theories heretical, but in fact the theories did not fit heresy’s medieval definition. Curiously, some who used the term held risky positions. My objective is to determine whether scholastics considered dangerous theories heretical. Preliminary findings indicate some thought they should be classed as such; while others used the term for protection when holding risky views. Both groups acted strategically, to condemn or promote theories. I believe we witness here a negotiation process of where the boundary to permitted science should be drawn. My approach is new: historiography on the subject relies on scarce documentary evidence; instead I examine a rich source novel for this question, cases of scholastics calling theories heretical in philosophical/theological writings, and I analyse the context to determine their motivation. In redefining the philosophy/heresy relationship, I will give robust new perspective to the reception history and faith/reason problem. This innovative, multidisciplinary project will make a fact-based contribution to discussion of boundaries we place on scientific thinking, and will impact on how scholars and European society perceive the origins and development of our scientific heritage.

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "BOUNDSCI" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "BOUNDSCI" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.3.2.)

ICARUS (2020)

Information Content of locAlisation: fRom classical to qUantum Systems

Read More  

EVOMET (2019)

The rise and fall of metastatic clones under immune attack

Read More  

COLEX (2019)

Coopetition and Legislation in the Spanish Netherlands (1598-1665)

Read More