Explore the words cloud of the EpComp project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "EpComp" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
|Coordinator Country||Finland [FI]|
|Total cost||1˙470˙665 €|
|EC max contribution||1˙470˙665 € (100%)|
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
|Duration (year-month-day)||from 2018-01-01 to 2022-12-31|
Take a look of project's partnership.
|1||HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO||FI (HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO)||coordinator||1˙470˙665.00|
This project formulates and defends a novel approach in epistemology, demonstrating how it solves a range of key problems in the field. New frontiers of research are opened up by applying the core lessons learnt in epistemology to the study of practical reason and ethics.
My dual evaluations approach hypothesizes that for a wide range of key evaluative notions, competence is neither necessary nor sufficient for success: there are both cases of incompetent success and of competent failure. For instance, a subject can know without exercising knowledge-conducive competence, and vice versa – and similarly for justified or rational belief. The project demonstrates how this recognition solves a cluster of key problems in the field relating to so-called higher-order evidence, and how it allows accommodating internalist evaluations in more externalist frameworks, thus bridging perhaps the most significant divide in epistemology.
What will emerge is a thorough re-structuring of the epistemological landscape. The project generalizes some of the lessons learnt to the study of structural requirements of rationality. Finally, the approach is deployed to investigate the relationship between morally right and morally worthy action. The main objectives of the project are:
(O1) To develop the theoretical foundations of the dual evaluations approach.
(O2) To put forth a novel view in epistemology that demonstrates how recognizing both cases of competent failure and incompetent success solves highly current problems and puzzles, reconciling two opposing theoretical starting points.
(O3) To investigate and ultimately reject as theoretically important the notion of structural rationality, offering an alternative, competence-based explanation of verdicts that seem to show the need for such a notion.
(O4) To explore generalizations of the results of the previous parts of the project to the practical and moral domains.
|year||authors and title||journal||last update|
Armchair Access and Imagination
published pages: 525-547, ISSN: 0012-2017, DOI: 10.1111/1746-8361.12249
Dispositional Evaluations and Defeat
published pages: , ISSN: , DOI:
|Reasons, Justification and Defeat||2019-09-05|
Higher-Order Defeat and Evincibility
published pages: , ISSN: , DOI:
Reflective Access, Closure, and Epistemological Disjunctivism
published pages: , ISSN: 1742-3600, DOI:
Knowing Without Having The Competence to Do So
published pages: 110-118, ISSN: 2161-2234, DOI: 10.1002/tht3.411
|Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8/2||2019-09-05|
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "EPCOMP" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (firstname.lastname@example.org) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "EPCOMP" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.