VALUES

NORMATIVE PRACTICES IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE. A THEORETICAL MODELING OF FORMS OF CIVIC ENGAGEMENT

 Partecipanti

Mappa

 Word cloud

Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.

 Obiettivo del progetto (Objective)

'In this research project I propose an approach to normativity and to the functioning of norms in the coordination of social life that is based upon a theory of normativity as practice. The aim of this project is threefold. Firstly, to show that our understanding of normativity remains utterly opaque as long as we do not take into account the plurality of empirical practices through which normative regulations are effected. Secondly, to prove that sociality is one of the central sources of normativity and that the functioning of normativity cannot be fully understood unless the epistemic implications of the social dimension are considered. Thirdly, to develop a theoretical model and conceptual tools to be used in the analysis and resolution of moral disagreements and political controversies. A pragmatist epistemology of practices is the conceptual framework within which this project has been conceived, while the theory of rationality as a social institution is the conception of rationality that grounds it. Jointly, these approaches require and justify the thoroughly interdisciplinary approach to normativity that this project intends to pursue.'

Introduzione (Teaser)

EU-funded researchers worked to advance a society-centred and practice-based theory of normativity. They adopted a new approach to the study of the concept, based upon the priority of normative practices over normative contents.

Descrizione progetto (Article)

Integrating some of the main works produced in this direction in the last few decades, the 'Normative practices in the public sphere.

A theoretical modeling of forms of civic engagement' (VALUES) project embarked on a sociological study of agents' normative behaviour.

Of the three major aims, the first was to provide a theoretical account of the epistemic conditions that qualify the functioning of normative practices.

The second was to provide a framework for analysing and describing the main forms of normative practices.

Lastly, VALUES intended to develop conceptual tools for analysing specific cases of moral and sociopolitical controversies.Following an interdisciplinary approach that draws from both philosophy and the social sciences, project work was divided into three main phases.

The first phase defined the theoretical framework.

To this end, articles were produced on three areas of inquiry, justifying the theoretical grounds on which the theory of normative practices was to be built.

In the first article, VALUES highlights the pragmatist origins of the idea of rationality as a social institution.

The other two articles cover the concept of rationality (and its main conceptual components) as a social institution, and the concept of pragmatic objectivity.

A plan was also outlined for a book on the theory of normative practices.To arrive at a definition of the model of normativity as practice, the second phase involved two steps.

The first focused on evolving a general definition of the notion of practice that is suited to the description of normative practices and their main analytical elements.

The second aimed to identify the main theoretical grounds on which the practical aspects of normativity will have to be taken into account.

The latter considered Frederick Will's theory of rational governance of norms, which is deemed a general theory of normativity as practice.

A paper on this topic was produced.

A book chapter on the empirical basis of the model of normative practices is in progress, as is another book chapter on the taxonomy of normative practices.Phase 3 was designed to expand on existing literature so as to develop an evidence-based taxonomy of normative practices.

With a focus on empirical studies describing how ordinary agents engage in normative practices, VALUES researchers have completed one discussion paper and are preparing another two.Although the project ended six months earlier than expected, all main milestones for each phase were achieved.