Explore the words cloud of the CoCEAL project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "CoCEAL" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
UNIVERSITA COMMERCIALE LUIGI BOCCONI
|Coordinator Country||Italy [IT]|
|Total cost||1˙254˙105 €|
|EC max contribution||1˙254˙105 € (100%)|
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
|Duration (year-month-day)||from 2016-09-01 to 2021-08-31|
Take a look of project's partnership.
|1||UNIVERSITA COMMERCIALE LUIGI BOCCONI||IT (MILANO)||coordinator||478˙618.00|
|2||UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA TOR VERGATA||IT (ROMA)||participant||403˙440.00|
|3||UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI TRIESTE||IT (TRIESTE)||participant||372˙046.00|
The European dimension of administrative law is the focus of a flurry of initiatives aiming to investigate similarities and differences, and to shape common legal scenarios. A codification of the administrative procedures of the EU has been envisaged by the European Parliament in its resolution of February 2013. A broader proposal of codification, including rule-making and contractual procedures, has been elaborated by ReNEUAL and has been discussed in a series of workshops in 2015.
The issues that arise are both practical and theoretical:
- it is important to understand whether the method traditionally followed by the European Court of Justice in order to identify the principles that are general and common to national legal systems, only applies when all those systems recognize such principles; - whether national systems of public law share the same idea of what an administrative procedure is is another question; whether the specific principles governing administrative procedures, such as the right to be heard and the duty to give reasons, are the same is still another question; - finally, if any commonality exists, the question that arises is whether it is limited to the level of general principles of law or it includes the which govern procedures.
The research project is innovative on grounds of method, because:
- it aims at ascertaining whether, and the extent to that, the well-established methodology developed under the ‘Common Core of European Private Law’ project can be applied to EU administrative law; - it permits to distinguish between ‘operative rules’, ‘descriptive formants’, and ‘meta-legal formants’; - it also allows to understand whether the specific nature of the interests recognized and protected by the rules of public law require legal methodologies that are distinct and distant from those of private law.
|year||authors and title||journal||last update|
della Cananea G.
\"The \"\"Common Core\"\" of Administrative Laws in Europe: a Research Agenda\"
published pages: 1-29, ISSN: , DOI:
Angela Ferrari Zumbini
Judicial Review Of Administrative Action In The Austro-Hungarian Empire. The Formative Years (1890-1910)
published pages: 9-48, ISSN: 2239-8279, DOI:
|Italian Journal of Public Law (IJPL) twice a year||2020-01-28|
â€˜The Common Core of European Administrative Lawâ€™ project: Methodological Roots
published pages: , ISSN: , DOI:
Judicial Review Of Administrative Action In The United Kingdom: The Status Of Standards Between 1890 And 1910
published pages: 49-96, ISSN: 2239-8279, DOI:
|Italian Journal of Public Law twice a year||2020-01-28|
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "COCEAL" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (firstname.lastname@example.org) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "COCEAL" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.