Opendata, web and dolomites


Critique and Reformation of Doctrine in International Investment Law: Legal Theory and Empirical Legal Studies

Total Cost €


EC-Contrib. €






Project "CReDItIs" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.


Organization address
address: NORREGADE 10
postcode: 1165

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country Denmark [DK]
 Total cost 207˙312 €
 EC max contribution 207˙312 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.3.2. (Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility)
 Code Call H2020-MSCA-IF-2018
 Funding Scheme MSCA-IF-EF-ST
 Starting year 2020
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2020-09-01   to  2022-12-31


Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    KOBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET DK (KOBENHAVN) coordinator 207˙312.00


 Project objective

The protection of international investments by international agreements such as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and its enforcement by Investor-State Dispute Settlement is currently subject of an important political debate. That debate pits the goal of attracting and protecting international investments against that of avoiding the exploitation of host countries and undermining their domestic law. CReDItIs will develop a new theoretical foundation for international investment law, putting particular emphasis on systematic and theoretical rigour and using expropriation as a case-study. It challenges the dominant stance of legal scholarship by using both legal theory and legal-empirical research. For orthodox scholars, the law in international treaties is authoritatively defined by what 'authorities' have said. Ad hoc investment tribunals adjudicate on investment disputes on the basis of mostly bilateral investment agreements. These awards do not have formal precedential value, and the agreements they rely upon are similar, but not identical. Yet not only are awards of great factual importance, legal scholarship believes that they can somehow be applied even to treaties on which they do not adjudicate. In contrast, for legal-realist empiricism, the law is what the courts decide. CReDItIs will contrast these views with the Pure Theory of Law, which is a legal theory arguing that seeing law as norms is possible without admixing it with nonlegal norms, or reducing law to facts. It will highlight the factual importance of awards and treaties through the use of empirical tools such as citation network analysis while distinguishing this from false designs to unify and concretise these results as law. The law remains fragmented; the law remains unspecific, even if and when judicial pronouncements and treaties are similarly worded.

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "CREDITIS" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email ( and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "CREDITIS" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.3.2.)

ToMComputations (2019)

How other minds are represented in the human brain: Neural computations underlying Theory of Mind

Read More  

DEMOS (2019)

Disfluencies and Eye MOvements during Speech: what can they reveal about language production?

Read More  

MathematicsAnalogies (2019)

Mathematics Analogies

Read More