AGAPE

Exploring Anti-GentrificAtion PracticEs and policies in Southern European Cities

Coordinatore	UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER    more  Organization address address: University Road city: LEICESTER postcode: LE1 7RH contact info Titolo: Dr. Nome: Sarah Cognome: Britton Email: send email Telefono: +44 116 223 1799 Fax: +44 116 252 2028
Nazionalità Coordinatore	United Kingdom [UK]
Totale costo	221˙606 €
EC contributo	221˙606 €
Programma	FP7-PEOPLE Specific programme "People" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013)
Code Call	FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IEF
Funding Scheme	MC-IEF
Anno di inizio	2014
Periodo (anno-mese-giorno)	2014-10-01   -   2016-09-30

 Partecipanti

#	participant	country	role	EC contrib. [€]
1	UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER  Organization address address: University Road city: LEICESTER postcode: LE1 7RH contact info Titolo: Dr. Nome: Sarah Cognome: Britton Email: send email Telefono: +44 116 223 1799 Fax: +44 116 252 2028	UK (LEICESTER)	coordinator	221˙606.40

Mappa

 Word cloud

Esplora la "nuvola delle parole (Word Cloud) per avere un'idea di massima del progetto.

 Obiettivo del progetto (Objective)

'The overall aim of AGAPE is to explore and improve our knowledge of anti-gentrification practices as performed in the urban space of Southern European cities (SECs), specifically Rome, Madrid and Athens, with a particular focus on their incorporation into - and capabilities to inform - local policy makings. In SECs the effects of gentrification are now being exacerbated by the debt crisis and the consequential austerity behaviors of nation states. For this reason, SECs offer an opportune setting in which to study the relationship between gentrification and policy, as well as forms of resistance and alternative responses to gentrification. Empirical evidence suggests that there are emerging practices of reaction, and alternative solutions, to the hegemonic narrative of the “commodified city” in SECs that are directly addressing the broader issue of the habitability of the city. However, these practices appear to be fragmented and we lack systematic understanding of their potential and their capabilities in countering urban inequalities. As such anti-gentrification practices and policies performed in these three SECs will be investigated and compared in order to construct a model of territorial capacities: capacities to counter the hegemony of gentrification at this particular ‘political’ moment in time, by incorporating far sighted and socially just policies for the re-use of the material assets of these cities. Such an exploration will provide much needed theoretical and empirical material for a post-crisis urban agenda aimed at achieving social justice and equity. The findings of the research will inform an academic narrative of resistance that will highlight ‘alternative narratives’ based on counter-gentrification practices in these three cities. The research findings will be also rendered in forms of an anti-gentrification toolkit that will provide the basic tools that local communities can draw on to fight gentrification and concrete ideas for policy makers.'