Explore the words cloud of the IMPROVE project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "IMPROVE" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT BRABANT
|Coordinator Country||Netherlands [NL]|
|Total cost||1˙999˙747 €|
|EC max contribution||1˙999˙747 € (100%)|
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
|Duration (year-month-day)||from 2017-06-01 to 2022-05-31|
Take a look of project's partnership.
|1||STICHTING KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT BRABANT||NL (TILBURG)||coordinator||1˙999˙747.00|
With numerous failures to replicate, common misreporting of results, widespread failure to publish non-significant results or to share data, and considerable potential bias due the flexibility of analyses of data and researcher’s tendency to exploit that flexibility, psychological science is said to experience a crisis of confidence. These issues lead to dissemination of false positive results and inflate effect size estimates in meta-analyses. This leads to poor theory building, an inefficient scientific system, a waste of resources, lower trust in psychological science, and psychology’s outcomes being less useful for society. After having contributed to the literature highlighting these problems the goal of my ERC project is to improve psychological science by offering novel solutions to five vexing challenges: (1) I want to counter misreporting of results by using our new tool statcheck in several studies on reviewers’ tendency to demand perfection and by applying it to actual peer review. (2) I want to counter the biasing effects of common explorations of data (p-hacking) by professing and studying pre-registration and by developing promising new approaches called blind analysis and cross-validation using differential privacy that simultaneously allows for exploration and confirmation with the same data. (3) I want to counter the common problem of selective outcome reporting in psychological experiments by developing powerful latent variable methods that render it fruitless to not report all outcome variables in a study. (4) I want to counter the problem of publication bias by studying and correcting misinterpretations of non-significance. (5) I want to develop and refine meta-analytic methods that allow for the correction of biases that currently inflate estimates of effects and obscure moderation. The innovative tools I develop have the potential to improve the way psychologists (and other scientists) analyse data, disseminate findings, and draw inferences.
|Data Management Plan||Open Research Data Pilot||2019-03-11 14:12:32|
Take a look to the deliverables list in detail: detailed list of IMPROVE deliverables.
|year||authors and title||journal||last update|
Balazs Aczel, Barnabas Szaszi, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Zoltan Kekecs, Å imon KucharskÃ½, Daniel Benjamin, Christopher D. Chambers, Agneta Fisher, Andrew Gelman, Morton A. Gernsbacher, John P. Ioannidis, Eric Johnson, Kai Jonas, Stavroula Kousta, Scott O. Lilienfeld, D. Stephen Lindsay, Candice C. Morey, Marcus MunafÃ², Benjamin R. Newell, Harold Pashler, David R. Shanks, Daniel J. Simons, Jelte M. W
A consensus-based transparency checklist
published pages: 4-6, ISSN: 2397-3374, DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
|Nature Human Behaviour 4/1||2020-02-04|
MichÃ¨le B. Nuijten, Marjan Bakker, Esther Maassen, Jelte M. Wicherts
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
published pages: , ISSN: 0140-525X, DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x18000791
|Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41||2020-02-04|
Paul Lodder, How Hwee Ong, Raoul P. P. P. Grasman, Jelte M. Wicherts
A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming.
published pages: 688-712, ISSN: 0096-3445, DOI: 10.1037/xge0000570
|Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148/4||2019-11-12|
Robbie C. M. van Aert, Jelte M. Wicherts, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
published pages: e0215052, ISSN: 1932-6203, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215052
|PLOS ONE 14/4||2019-11-12|
Paul Lodder, Johan Denollet, Wilco H. M. Emons, Giesje Nefs, Frans Pouwer, Jane Speight, Jelte M. Wicherts
Modeling Interactions Between Latent Variables in Research on Type D Personality: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Clinical Study of Depression and Anxiety
published pages: 637-665, ISSN: 0027-3171, DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1562863
|Multivariate Behavioral Research 54/5||2019-11-12|
Esther Maassen, Jelte M. Wicherts
Distinguishing Specific from General Effects in Cognition Research
published pages: 288-292, ISSN: 2211-3681, DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.06.007
|Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8/3||2019-11-12|
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
published pages: 90, ISSN: 2076-2615, DOI: 10.3390/ani7120090
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "IMPROVE" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (email@example.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "IMPROVE" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.