Opendata, web and dolomites

MINORLEGMOB SIGNED

Assessing the agency of national minorities through court cases: mapping legal mobilization patterns in CEE

Total Cost €

0

EC-Contrib. €

0

Partnership

0

Views

0

 MINORLEGMOB project word cloud

Explore the words cloud of the MINORLEGMOB project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "MINORLEGMOB" about.

structural    enlargement    candidate    actors    involvement    lens    outcomes    action    moving    agency    ed    international    disempowered    country    assert    cee    indicated    minority    deteriorated    time    court    opposed    formally    impression    joined    emphasis    treating    closely    mobilization    failing    scholarly    eastern    situation    countries    concerning    law    counterintuitive    accession    social    accounting    post    inter    first    defended    reform    respective    seems    combining    national    negative    change    region    serbia    questions    decisions    too    expectations    mobilisation    integration    resolved    put    argument    claimed    stagnated    largely    romania    led    central    minorities    belong    period    interdisciplinary    had    fostered    practice    others    accounts    rights    litigation    heavy    strategies    enforced    protection    contrast    union    hungary    science    followed    political    positive    activism    rulings    policy    forth   

Project "MINORLEGMOB" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.

Coordinator
Elliniko Idryma Evropaikis kai Exoterikis Politikis (HELLENIC FOUNDATION FOR EUROPEAN AND FOREIGN POLICY) 

Organization address
address: VASILISSIS SOFIAS AVENUE 49
city: ATHENS
postcode: 106 76
website: www.eliamep.gr

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country Greece [EL]
 Total cost 165˙085 €
 EC max contribution 165˙085 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.3.2. (Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility)
 Code Call H2020-MSCA-IF-2018
 Funding Scheme MSCA-IF-EF-ST
 Starting year 2019
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2019-11-01   to  2021-10-31

 Partnership

Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    Elliniko Idryma Evropaikis kai Exoterikis Politikis (HELLENIC FOUNDATION FOR EUROPEAN AND FOREIGN POLICY) EL (ATHENS) coordinator 165˙085.00

Map

 Project objective

The heavy involvement of the EU in the field of minority rights during the EU enlargement process to Central Eastern Europe (CEE) fostered the impression that problems related to national minorities had been largely resolved by the time the respective states joined the Union. By contrast, recent research indicated that the level of minority rights protection seems to have stagnated or even deteriorated in the post-accession period, which is counterintuitive to the positive expectations that followed these countries’ EU integration. The argument put forth here is that scholarly accounts of minority rights in the region focus too much on the role of international protection while treating minority representatives as disempowered actors to be defended, and failing to consider their potential for action to assert the rights that formally belong to them. The project’s interdisciplinary approach, combining legal studies with political science, will produce the first account of the agency and legal mobilisation of minorities in CEE, moving forward the scholarly debate beyond the current emphasis on structural conditions. The proposed research will therefore investigate the situation of minority rights through the lens of litigation and legal mobilization in two new EU Member States, Romania and Hungary and an EU candidate country, Serbia. The proposed project addresses four major, closely inter-related research questions: Which rights these minorities have claimed through litigation and which they have not, and what could explain their activism in some cases as opposed to others? Which legal mobilization strategies have led to favourable court decisions, which have resulted in negative rulings and what are the main factors accounting for these outcomes? Why some rights given by law are not enforced in practice? Finally: what could be achieved through litigation concerning minority rights in terms of policy reform and social change?

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "MINORLEGMOB" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "MINORLEGMOB" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.3.2.)

MIGPSC (2018)

Shaping the European Migration Policy: the role of the security industry

Read More  

EPIC (2019)

Evolution of Planktonic Gastropod Calcification

Read More  

FOCUSIS (2020)

Focal volume Control Using Structured Illumination Sources

Read More