Explore the words cloud of the FAIR LIMITS project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "FAIR LIMITS" about.
The following table provides information about the project.
|Coordinator Country||Netherlands [NL]|
|Total cost||2˙000˙000 €|
|EC max contribution||2˙000˙000 € (100%)|
1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
|Duration (year-month-day)||from 2017-07-01 to 2022-06-30|
Take a look of project's partnership.
|1||UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT||NL (UTRECHT)||coordinator||2˙000˙000.00|
In contemporary normative political philosophy, questions of distributive justice have focused on meeting minimal needs of persons, prioritizing the worst-off and reducing inequalities. In philosophy, these views are called ‘sufficientarianism’, ‘prioritarianism’ and ‘egalitarianism’. The proposed project —Fair Limits— shifts the focus to ‘limitarianism’, the view that there should be upper limits on the distribution of valuable goods, and will investigate the plausibility of limitarianism in the area of economic and ecological resources. We will analyse whether such a view can be justified, that is, supported by robust philosophical argumentation, and what limitarian institutions could look like. Fair Limits will confront basic assumptions commonly used in liberal political philosophy, including claims about what account of the quality of life our social institutions should protect, which goods are scarce, the insatiability of human wants, the status of ecosystem resources, and the nature of the economic system and its distributive consequences. An important way in which the project examines these assumptions is to study the relevant arguments of non-liberal philosophers. The critiques of non-liberal philosophers on the liberal paradigm, in which Fair Limits is situated, will be actively solicited and will become an integral part of this project. Methodologically, Fair Limits will advance the state of the field by developing methods for applied or non-ideal political philosophy. This emerging paradigm asks not merely what the right normative principles are, but rather (1) what moral duties imply for political duties, (2) questions of transition (how we move to a less unjust world, and what role political philosophy should play in this process) and (3) who, in an unjust world, the agents of justice should be.
|year||authors and title||journal||last update|
Tim Meijers, Ingrid Robeyns
Filantropie: conceptuele en ethische reflecties
published pages: 173-195, ISSN: , DOI:
|Filantropie op de grens van overheid en markt||2020-03-05|
Sandrine Blanc, Tim Meijers
Firms and parental justice: should firms contribute to the cost of parenthood and procreation?
published pages: 1-27, ISSN: 0266-2671, DOI: 10.1017/s0266267119000014
|Economics and Philosophy||2020-01-28|
What, if Anything, is Wrong with Extreme Wealth?
published pages: 251-266, ISSN: 1945-2829, DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734
|Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 20/3||2020-01-28|
Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better. By Rob Reich. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018. 256p. $27.95 cloth.
published pages: 1175-1176, ISSN: 1537-5927, DOI: 10.1017/s1537592719003256
|Perspectives on Politics 17/4||2020-01-28|
T.M. Scanlon, Why Does Inequality Matter? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 192 pages. isbn: 9780198812692. Hardback: Â£18.99.
published pages: 777-780, ISSN: 1740-4681, DOI: 10.1163/17455243-01606006
|Journal of Moral Philosophy 16/6||2020-01-28|
â€œBook review of The Inheritance of Wealth. Justice, Equality, and the Right to Bequeath, by Daniel Halliday.â€
published pages: 347-350, ISSN: 1370-0049, DOI: 10.2143/EP.25.2.3284950
|Ethical Perspectives 25(2)||2019-05-23|
Defending the Democratic Argument for Limitarianism: A Reply to Volacu and Dumitru
published pages: , ISSN: 0048-3893, DOI: 10.1007/s11406-018-0030-6
Petra van der Kooij, Dick Timmer
Een rechtvaardige klimaattransitie: effectief, flexibel, en democratisch
published pages: 41-44, ISSN: , DOI:
|Podium voor Bio-ethiek 25 (4)||2019-03-18|
Sem de Maagt, Ingrid Robeyns
Overerving en erfbelasting: een ethische analyse
published pages: , ISSN: , DOI:
|Ethische Annotaties 3||2019-03-12|
Kwaliteit van leven in het Antropoceen
published pages: 31-33, ISSN: , DOI:
|Podium voor Bio-ethiek 25 (4)||2019-03-12|
Ingrid Robeyns, Tanja van der Lippe, Vincent Buskens, Nina Vergeldt
Vinden Nederlanders dat er grenzen zijn aan rijkdom?
published pages: 399-402, ISSN: , DOI:
|ESB 103 (4765)||2019-03-12|
Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "FAIR LIMITS" project.
For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.
Send me an email (firstname.lastname@example.org) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.
Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.
The information about "FAIR LIMITS" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.