Opendata, web and dolomites

BIOUNCERTAINTY SIGNED

Deep uncertainties in bioethics: genetic research, preventive medicine, reproductive decisions

Total Cost €

0

EC-Contrib. €

0

Partnership

0

Views

0

 BIOUNCERTAINTY project word cloud

Explore the words cloud of the BIOUNCERTAINTY project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "BIOUNCERTAINTY" about.

decision    meta    rules    ontological    human    positions    diagnosis    contexts    mere    permissible    biomedical    seem    reinterpret    deontologism    metaphysical    everywhere    biomedicine    emerged    healthcare    practices    heuristics    rapid    medicine    context    instead    cells    regulations    status    preventive    normative    drive    accurately    makers    emotions    deep    ethics    bioethical    reflections    undistorted    interprets    scientific    valuing    reproductive    experiments    biases    conceptual    demarcate    saying    rarely    trigger    parthenogenetic    types    psychological    questions    deliberation    views    cognitions    regulating    bioethics    stem    scientists    indeterminacy    parthenotes    ethical    unreliable    policy    behavioral    judgments    consequentialism    reactions    vaccinations    moral    uncertainty    reasoning    influence    layers    decisions    combined    extensions    contractualism    kinds    documented    population    individuals    goes    yield    motivation    existence    alternative    decide    preimplantation    progress    forms    genetic    justifications    ways    distorted    hypothesis    hard   

Project "BIOUNCERTAINTY" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.

Coordinator
UNIWERSYTET JAGIELLONSKI 

Organization address
address: Ul. Golebia 24
city: KRAKOW
postcode: 31007
website: n.a.

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country Poland [PL]
 Total cost 1˙499˙625 €
 EC max contribution 1˙499˙625 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
 Code Call ERC-2018-STG
 Funding Scheme ERC-STG
 Starting year 2019
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2019-02-01   to  2024-01-31

 Partnership

Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    UNIWERSYTET JAGIELLONSKI PL (KRAKOW) coordinator 1˙499˙625.00

Map

 Project objective

Uncertainty is everywhere, as the saying goes, but rarely considered in ethical reflections. This project aims to reinterpret ethical discussions on current advances in biomedicine: instead of understanding bioethical positions as extensions of classical normative views in ethics (consequentialism, deontologism, contractualism etc.), my project interprets them more accurately as involving various normative approaches to decision making under uncertainty. The following hard cases in bioethics provide the motivation for research:

1) Regulating scientific research under uncertainty about the ontological/moral status (e.g. parthenogenetic stem cells derived from human parthenotes) in the context of meta-reasoning under normative uncertainty.

2) The value of preventive medicine in healthcare (e.g. vaccinations) in the context of decision-making under metaphysical indeterminacy.

3) Population or reproductive decisions (e.g. preimplantation genetic diagnosis) in the context of valuing mere existence.

The main drive behind this project is the rapid progress in biomedical research combined with new kinds of uncertainties. These new and “deep” uncertainties trigger specific forms of emotions and cognitions that influence normative judgments and decisions. The main research questions that will be addressed by conceptual analysis, new psychological experiments, and case studies are the following: how do the heuristics and biases (H&B) documented by behavioral scientists influence the formation of normative judgments in bioethical contexts; how to demarcate between distorted and undistorted value judgments; to what extent is it permissible for individuals or policy makers to yield to H&B. The hypothesis is that many existing bioethical rules, regulations, practices seem to have emerged from unreliable reactions, rather than by means of deliberation on the possible justifications for alternative ways to decide about them under several layers and types of uncertainty.

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "BIOUNCERTAINTY" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "BIOUNCERTAINTY" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.1.)

PROGRESS (2019)

The Enemy of the Good: Towards a Theory of Moral Progress

Read More  

DISINTEGRATION (2019)

The Mass Politics of Disintegration

Read More  

HOLI (2019)

Deep Learning for Holistic Inference

Read More