Opendata, web and dolomites

BIOUNCERTAINTY SIGNED

Deep uncertainties in bioethics: genetic research, preventive medicine, reproductive decisions

Total Cost €

0

EC-Contrib. €

0

Partnership

0

Views

0

 BIOUNCERTAINTY project word cloud

Explore the words cloud of the BIOUNCERTAINTY project. It provides you a very rough idea of what is the project "BIOUNCERTAINTY" about.

bioethics    valuing    everywhere    biomedicine    status    experiments    reproductive    psychological    judgments    context    contractualism    bioethical    justifications    moral    normative    rarely    policy    unreliable    motivation    deliberation    parthenotes    ethics    behavioral    reasoning    types    reflections    practices    goes    reinterpret    medicine    rapid    layers    individuals    distorted    deep    diagnosis    views    decisions    reactions    uncertainty    influence    trigger    consequentialism    existence    biomedical    metaphysical    alternative    forms    instead    decide    deontologism    seem    accurately    human    genetic    drive    demarcate    ontological    extensions    preimplantation    permissible    rules    heuristics    saying    contexts    emerged    positions    parthenogenetic    hard    combined    regulating    kinds    ethical    stem    makers    conceptual    cognitions    ways    scientific    scientists    documented    mere    hypothesis    emotions    healthcare    interprets    decision    preventive    progress    indeterminacy    undistorted    questions    meta    yield    regulations    cells    population    biases    vaccinations   

Project "BIOUNCERTAINTY" data sheet

The following table provides information about the project.

Coordinator
UNIWERSYTET JAGIELLONSKI 

Organization address
address: Ul. Golebia 24
city: KRAKOW
postcode: 31007
website: n.a.

contact info
title: n.a.
name: n.a.
surname: n.a.
function: n.a.
email: n.a.
telephone: n.a.
fax: n.a.

 Coordinator Country Poland [PL]
 Total cost 1˙499˙625 €
 EC max contribution 1˙499˙625 € (100%)
 Programme 1. H2020-EU.1.1. (EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC))
 Code Call ERC-2018-STG
 Funding Scheme ERC-STG
 Starting year 2019
 Duration (year-month-day) from 2019-02-01   to  2024-01-31

 Partnership

Take a look of project's partnership.

# participants  country  role  EC contrib. [€] 
1    UNIWERSYTET JAGIELLONSKI PL (KRAKOW) coordinator 1˙499˙625.00

Map

 Project objective

Uncertainty is everywhere, as the saying goes, but rarely considered in ethical reflections. This project aims to reinterpret ethical discussions on current advances in biomedicine: instead of understanding bioethical positions as extensions of classical normative views in ethics (consequentialism, deontologism, contractualism etc.), my project interprets them more accurately as involving various normative approaches to decision making under uncertainty. The following hard cases in bioethics provide the motivation for research:

1) Regulating scientific research under uncertainty about the ontological/moral status (e.g. parthenogenetic stem cells derived from human parthenotes) in the context of meta-reasoning under normative uncertainty.

2) The value of preventive medicine in healthcare (e.g. vaccinations) in the context of decision-making under metaphysical indeterminacy.

3) Population or reproductive decisions (e.g. preimplantation genetic diagnosis) in the context of valuing mere existence.

The main drive behind this project is the rapid progress in biomedical research combined with new kinds of uncertainties. These new and “deep” uncertainties trigger specific forms of emotions and cognitions that influence normative judgments and decisions. The main research questions that will be addressed by conceptual analysis, new psychological experiments, and case studies are the following: how do the heuristics and biases (H&B) documented by behavioral scientists influence the formation of normative judgments in bioethical contexts; how to demarcate between distorted and undistorted value judgments; to what extent is it permissible for individuals or policy makers to yield to H&B. The hypothesis is that many existing bioethical rules, regulations, practices seem to have emerged from unreliable reactions, rather than by means of deliberation on the possible justifications for alternative ways to decide about them under several layers and types of uncertainty.

Are you the coordinator (or a participant) of this project? Plaese send me more information about the "BIOUNCERTAINTY" project.

For instance: the website url (it has not provided by EU-opendata yet), the logo, a more detailed description of the project (in plain text as a rtf file or a word file), some pictures (as picture files, not embedded into any word file), twitter account, linkedin page, etc.

Send me an  email (fabio@fabiodisconzi.com) and I put them in your project's page as son as possible.

Thanks. And then put a link of this page into your project's website.

The information about "BIOUNCERTAINTY" are provided by the European Opendata Portal: CORDIS opendata.

More projects from the same programme (H2020-EU.1.1.)

ENUF (2019)

Evaluation of Novel Ultra-Fast selective III-V Epitaxy

Read More  

HydroLieve (2018)

A long-lasting non-migrating hydrogel for relieving chronic pain

Read More  

REAL (2019)

Rights and Egalitarianism

Read More